Pragmatics and Presupposition
نویسندگان
چکیده
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
منابع مشابه
Presupposition as a Pragmatic Inference toward a New Conceptualization of the Term
The paper glosses the pragmatic inference of presupposition in a way different from what has been mentioned elsewhere in the previous researches. All researches conducted on this inference viewed it as an internally linguistic system. To have figured it that way, the writer of This paper thinks that is the main reason which made a linguist like Levinson(1983) to consider it as partially underst...
متن کاملThe Semantics/Pragmatics Interface
We survey three domains – scalar implicatures, presupposition, and conventional implicatures – in which the division of labor between semantics and pragmatics has given rise to new empirical and formal insights in the last decade. In each case, there is a vibrant contemporary debate concerning the modular decomposition of rich arrays of data.
متن کاملPresuppositions, Projection, and Accommodation - Theoretical Issues and Experimental Approaches
1 Current Issues in Presupposition Theory 2 1.1 Basic Phenomena . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.2 Semantics vs. Pragmatics and Explanatory Challenges . . . . . . 5 1.2.1 The Triggering Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.2.2 The Projection Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 1.3 Distinguishing Types of Presupposition Triggers . . . . . . . . . 11
متن کاملAgainst the Identification of Anaphora and Presupposition
Since van der Sandt and Geurts have put forward and extensively applied the notion of a fundamental identity of presupposition and anaphora, something like a universal consensus seems to have developed that this view is basically correct. Supposing that it is, and further supposing that it entails an empirical hypothesis, there are a number of facts that have so far remained unaccounted for. Th...
متن کاملThe Complementary Relation between Pragmatics and Systemic-Functional Grammar
Pragmatics and Systemic -functional Grammar (SFG) used to ignore each other and lack in communication, however, in certain aspects they are indeed in a position to complement each other. This paper mainly discusses on one hand the bases for the complementary relation between pragmatics and systemic -functional grammar (CR-P&SFG), on the other hand the main aspects concerning the CR-P&SFG. Pragm...
متن کاملWhy metaphors make good insults: perspectives, presupposition, and pragmatics
Metaphors are powerful communicative tools because they produce ‘framing effects’. These effects are especially palpable when the metaphor is an insult that denigrates the hearer or someone he cares about. In such cases, just comprehending the metaphor produces a kind of ‘complicity’ that cannot easily be undone by denying the speaker’s claim. Several theorists have taken this to show that meta...
متن کامل